Case studiesBusinessIllustrative example
A five-country manufacturing group, rebuilt around one holding
Five operating companies owned in a chain that grew by acquisition, each paying tax on the way up. We put one holding on top, moved group financing and procurement to where the people are, and cut the leakage at every border.
4.8EUR m / year
recurring tax saving
- Client
- Family-owned manufacturing group, around EUR 180m revenue
- Countries
- DE · PL · CZ · NL · US
- Timeline
- Typically nine to twelve months, in stages.
The situation
The group had grown by buying companies, and each acquisition had been bolted on wherever it was convenient at the time. Dividends crossed three borders before reaching the family, losing withholding tax along the way.
Group financing ran through the German parent with no transfer pricing to support it, procurement for all five factories sat in a company with two employees, and the US subsidiary's profits were stuck because repatriating them was expensive.
What we did
- 1Mapped every flow of money in the group: dividends, interest, management fees, royalties and trade.
- 2Placed a single holding company in the Netherlands with real board substance, and moved the operating companies under it in a tax-neutral reorganisation.
- 3Moved group procurement to the Polish company, where the purchasing team actually works, and priced it with a documented margin.
- 4Refinanced intra-group debt at arm's-length rates with documentation, and set a repatriation plan for the US profits under the treaty.
- 5Aligned the family's own shareholding and dividend policy with the new structure.
The outcome
About EUR 4.8m a year less tax and withholding across the group, from a group effective rate near 29% to around 22%.
One holding, one set of intercompany agreements, and a structure the next generation and any buyer can understand.
Completed engagements are marked as such; examples marked "Illustrative" show how a typical situation is handled and are not client results. Names, sectors, figures and timings are generalised or omitted so that no client is identifiable. Every result depends on that client's facts. Nothing here predicts what your position would produce, and nothing here is advice.
More case studies
Business · EE · NL · DE
2.4EUR m / year
recurring tax saving
A three-country software group, from 26% to 14%
The group's IP sat in a holding company with no people behind it. We moved it to where the team works, added real substance, and documented the whole thing to file.
Read the case studyBusiness · ES · PL · BR
0.9EUR m
exposure closed before any audit
Nine countries of contractors, made compliant
Long-tenured contractors were working full time, to fixed hours, on company equipment. In three countries that is employment, and the exposure had been building for two years.
Illustrative exampleRead the case studyBusiness · US · PT · PL
0.7USD m
of tax exposure avoided
A US start-up's European team, set up before it became a problem
A Delaware company was paying European engineers as contractors from the US. Their senior engineers were effectively running the product from Lisbon.
Illustrative exampleRead the case studyFind out what your structure could save.
One conversation to map the whole picture: you, your family, your companies, the people you employ, and where each of them sits today.
Free, 30 minutes, by video or phone. Every request answered within 24 hours.